The Future of Education

Administrators, faculty/staff, and students of Higher Education Institutions in Region XII had the following profile based on the majority of the respondents. Institutional development services were significantly affected or influenced by the respondents’ socio-demographic characteristics. There were institutional development services  implemented in instruction, research, extension, and production with focus on the whole organization, system orientation, use of change agent, problem solving, experiential learning, group processes, feedback, contingency orientation, and team building. Faculty/Staff rated satisfactory on their institutional development services in instruction and research while fair for extension and production. Meanwhile, students rated satisfactory on the institutional development services in instruction, research, extension and production. Administrators, faculty and staff and students had the following profile based on what they ranked as the variables that contributed most for institutional development. There were no significant differences on the current institutional development services in instruction, research, extension, and production. Faculty and staff rated fair on the weaknesses and problems encountered in research, extension and production. Meanwhile, students rated fair on the weaknesses/problems encountered in instruction, research, and extension, while in production not serious for state HEIs and fair for private HEIs. There were significant differences on the weaknesses and   problems encountered by faculty and staff between these state and private HEIs along with instruction, research and extension while significant differences did not occur in production. Meanwhile, there were no significant differences on the weaknesses/problems encountered by students between the state and private HEIs along with instruction, research, extension, and production.

.