The proliferation of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) and other forms of informal online learning has created many opportunities for learning outside of the formal educational structure and reshaped how people learn and work. Research suggests that the flexibility and lack of learner-support structures that are typically in place in traditional learning environments indicates that learners’ motivational beliefs and Self-Regulated Learning (SRL) strategies become critical for learners’ success and persistence in these new learning environments. However, according to recent research, not all learners possess the knowledge management and self-regulatory skills to effectively customize and manage the learning experience they want. Although SRL has been extensively examined in the context of formal online learning and has been linked to an increase in learners’ achievement and persistence, it has not been investigated thoroughly within the context of informal learning settings such as MOOCs. The current empirical study adds to the literature at the intersection of SRL in informal online learning settings such as MOOCs and participants’ achievement of self-set goals. Specifically, this study used the social cognitive framework of SRL (Pintrich, 1995; Zimmerman, 2000) to explore the relations between MOOC learners’ motivational beliefs (i.e. goal orientation, online learning self-efficacy, and online learning task value), use of SRL strategies (i.e. time management, effort regulation, peer learning, and help seeking), and self-reported persistence to goals while taking into account the unique characteristics that distinguish MOOCs as a learning environment from formal online courses as well as MOOC participants’ needs and learning experience compared to that of traditional students.
Kewywords: MOOCs, Massive Open Online Courses, Self-Regulated Learning, SRL, Informal Learning Environments.
References:
[1] Pintrich, P. R. “Understanding self-regulated learning”, New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 1995, 63, 3-12.
[2] Zimmerman, B. J. “Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective” In: Handbook of Self-Regulation, edited by M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, and M. Zeidner, San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 2000, pp. 13-39.
[3] Kolowich, S. “Why some colleges are saying no to MOOC deals, at least for now”, The Chronicle of Higher Education. Date of access: 14/5/2017. http://chronicle.com/article/Why-Some-Colleges-Are-Saying/138863/, 2013.
[4] Kop, R., and Fournier, H. “New dimensions to self-directed learning in an open networked learning environment”, International Journal of Self-Directed Learning, 2010, 7(2), 1-18.
[5] Kitsantas, A., and Dabbagh. N. “Learning to Learn with Integrative Learning Technologies: A Practical Guide for Academic Success”, Charlotte, Information Age Publishers, 2010.
[6] Dabbagh, N., and Kitsantas, A. “Personal Learning Environments, social media, and self-regulated learning: A natural formula for connecting formal and informal learning”, The Internet and Higher Education, 2012, 15(1), 3-8.
[7] Fontana, R. P., Milligan, C., Littlejohn, A., and Margaryan, A. “Measuring self‐regulated learning in the workplace”, International Journal of Training and Development, 2015, 19(1), 32-52.
[8] Pintrich, P. R. “The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning”, Handbook of Self-Regulation, edited by M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, and M. Zeidner, San Diego, Academic, 2000, pp. 451-502.
[9] Zweig, D. S., and Webster, J. D. “Validation of a multidimensional measure of goal orientation”, Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 2004, 36(3), 232-243.
[10] Artino, A. R., and McCoach, D. B. “Development and initial validation of the online learning task value and self-efficacy scale”, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 2008, 38(3), 279-303.
[11] Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., García, T., and McKeachie, W. J. “Reliability and predictive validity of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ)”, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1993, 53, 801-813.
[12] Puzziferro, M. “Online technologies self-efficacy and self-regulated learning as predictors of final grade and satisfaction in college-level online courses” American Journal of Distance Education, 2008, 22(2), 72-89.
[13] Balakrishnan, G., and Coetzee, D. “Predicting student retention in Massive Open Online Courses using hidden Markov models”, Technical Report No. UCB/EECS-2013-109, 2013,Date of access: 10/02/2018. https://www2.eecs.berkeley.edu/Pubs/TechRpts/2013/EECS-2013-109.html.
[14] Nawrot, I., and Doucet, A. “Building engagement for MOOC students: Introducing support for time management on online learning platforms”, Proceedings of the 23rd International World Wide Web Conference, Seoul, Korea, 2014, pp. 1077-1082.
The Future of Education
