Innovation in Language Learning

Edition 17

Accepted Abstracts

How the COI Framework Explains the Online Discussion Patterns in an EFL writing course in South Korea

Ashleigh Southam, Deakin University (Australia)

Han Zhang, National Research University Higher School of Economics (Russian Federation)

Ruoqi Cao, School of Digital Humanities and Computational Social Sciences (Korea, Republic of)

Mik Fanguy, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST) (Korea, Republic of)

Jamie Costley, Kongju National University (Korea, Republic of)

Abstract

This study aims to shed light how the community of inquiry (CoI) framework that includes social presence, cognitive presence and teaching presence can explain online interactions in a discussion forum in a 10 week flipped English writing course. Participants were post graduate students from the STEM field form a large South Korean University. During the course, students engaged in scientific writing tasks and online interaction in English. They worked collaboratively online and in class. Questionnaires distributed to capture students’ levels of social, cognitive and teacher presence. Online participation and interaction was then measured in the form of discussions created and replies posted to discussion in an online forum relating to class topics. These behaviors indicate two distinct rhetoric purposes and in order to understand this further, the data was correlated with the levels of social, cognitive and teacher presence. It was found that cognitive presence and initiating discussions were positively correlated but not with the continuation of discussions in the form of replies posted on the forum. The suggestion is that students engaging in the cognitive dimension may be more likely to initiate discussion topics during online interaction in EFL writing classes but not with following up on these discussions. This current study adds to existing literature on the relationship between CoI framework and online posting behaviors in the ELF writing context.

 

 

References:

  1. Bognar B., Sablić M., Škugor A. (2019) Flipped Learning and Online Discussion in Higher Education Teaching. In: Daniela L. (Eds). Didactics of Smart Pedagogy. (pp. 371-392). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01551-0_19
  2. Galikyan, I., & Admiraal, W. (2019). Students' engagement in asynchronous online discussion: The relationship between cognitive presence, learner prominence, and academic performance. The Internet and Higher Education, 43, 100692.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2019.100692
  3. Swan, K., Garrison, D. R., & Richardson, J. C. (2009). A constructivist approach to online learning: The community of inquiry framework. Information technology and constructivism in higher education: Progressive learning frameworks (pp. 43-57). IGI global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60566-654-9.ch004
  4. Yu, T., & Richardson, J. C. (2015). Examining reliability and validity of a Korean version of the Community of Inquiry instrument using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. The Internet and Higher Education, 25, 45-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.12.004

 

Back to the list

REGISTER NOW

Reserved area


Media Partners:

Click BrownWalker Press logo for the International Academic and Industry Conference Event Calendar announcing scientific, academic and industry gatherings, online events, call for papers and journal articles
Pixel - Via Luigi Lanzi 12 - 50134 Firenze (FI) - VAT IT 05118710481
    Copyright © 2024 - All rights reserved

Privacy Policy

Webmaster: Pinzani.it