New Perspectives in Science Education

Edition 13

Accepted Abstracts

MOOCs for ESP: Potential and Limitations

Maria Rudneva, RUDN University (Russian Federation)

Rdouan Faizi, ENSIAS Mohammed V University in Rabat (Morocco)

Nailya Valeeva, RUDN University (Russian Federation)

Abstract

The study discusses an attempt to repurpose and incorporate a freely available online MOOC on academic writing into the existing offline academic curriculum. To date a few hybrid learning models have been implemented at HE entities [Zhang, 2013], [Kloos et al 2014] in an attempt to benefit from the available MOOCs. Past research highlighted a few positive implications of suchlike blended learning approach [Aycock et al 2002], [Gilbert et al, 2011], [Rodrigues et al, 2011], etc. However, there has been little research on incorporating MOOCs created by third parties into language classes. The authors present several cases of blended learning courses offered to undergraduate and postgraduate students at RUDN University, Moscow. Because of limited hours allocated to face-to-face tuition, it was decided to draw on existing educational resources and incorporate a MOOCs in current ESP curriculum to increase learners’ exposure to academic L2 in self-paced independent environment. Upon completion of each module the participants were requested to complete a Likert scale based survey as well as share their de-identified informal feedback on the blended learning experience. As a result of a series of experiments the authors propose several comprehensive models of incorporating MOOCs in L2 classes and discuss limitations and advantages of this approach. Additional results and possible solutions will be presented at the conference.

Keywords: Blended learning, English for specific purposes, MOOC.

References:
[1] A. Aycock, C. Garnham, R. Kaleta, Lessons learned from the hybrid course project. Teaching with Technology Today, 8(6), 2002. Retrieved from ttp://www.uwsa.edu/ttt/articles/garnham2.htm
[2] J.A. Gilbert, R. Flores-Zambada, Development and implementation of a "blended" teaching course environment. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 7(2), 244-260. 2011. Retrieved from http://jolt.merlot.org/vol7no2/gilbert_0611.htm
[3] M.A. Rodriguez,  R. C. R. Anicete, Students' views of a mixed hybrid ecology course. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 6(4), 791-798. 2011. Retrieved from
http://jolt.merlot.org/vol6no4/rodriguez_1210.htm
[4] Y. Zhang, Benefiting from MOOC. In World conference on educational multimedia. Hypermedia and Telecommunications, 2013(1), pp. 1372–1377.
[5] C. D. Kloos, P. J. Munoz-Merino, M. Munoz-Organero, C. Alario-Hoyos, J.A. Perez-Sanagustın Ruiperez, J.L. Sanz, Experiences running MOOCs and SPOCs at UC3M. In Proceedings of the IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), pp. 884–891, 2014.
[6] C. D. Kloos, P.J. Munoz-Merino, C. Alario-Hoyos, I.E. Ayres, C. Fernandez-Panadero, C., Mixing and blending MOOC technologies with face-to-face pedagogies. In Proceedings of the IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), Tallin, Estonia, pp. 967–971, 2015.

Back to the list

REGISTER NOW

Reserved area


Media Partners:

Click BrownWalker Press logo for the International Academic and Industry Conference Event Calendar announcing scientific, academic and industry gatherings, online events, call for papers and journal articles
Pixel - Via Luigi Lanzi 12 - 50134 Firenze (FI) - VAT IT 05118710481
    Copyright © 2024 - All rights reserved

Privacy Policy

Webmaster: Pinzani.it