Pixel International Conferences

Digital Library Directory > New Perspectives in Science Education 6th Edition 2017
New Perspectives in Science Education 6th Edition 2017

Students’ Misconceptions in Some Chemical Principles within a Biological Context

Sarah Farrugia; Martin Musumeci

Abstract

Science is all around us. From a young age, students start observing things around them and acquire knowledge from various sources such as, and including, the media and the social networks, which might not always be correct. At school, teachers try to keep scientific knowledge as simple as possible in order not to confuse and baffle students with content that they would not really need at that stage in their lives at school. However, at times, such methodologies might lead to incomplete or superficial knowledge that can eventually act as a hurdle or a barrier in the process of learning.

The aim of this research study was to provide an insight into students’ misconceptions regarding some basic chemical concepts relevant to the topic “Part 2: Keeping Alive, Topic A: The Chemicals of Life”, that is part of the 2014 Secondary Education Certificate (SEC) Biology syllabus (which leads to the 16+ examination at the end of Secondary school) in Maltese Secondary schools. The investigation dealt with eventual patterns present in any misconceptions in the four different groups involved in the study: girls and boys with Biology as their only Science subject, and girls and boys having both Chemistry and Biology as subject options at school.

The main research instrument used for this research study was a 30-minute multiple-choice test, taken by each of these four groups. The sample of students that were involved in the study was composed of about 20 students in each of the four categories. The outcomes of this research study suggest that, in general, students studying Chemistry harbour less misconceptions in certain chemical principles that are relevant to Biology. The study also shows that girls manifested less chemical misconceptions and that subject choice played a more significant role in the number of misconceptions for girls rather than for boys.

 

References

[1] Cheung, D. (2009). Students’ attitudes toward chemistry lessons: The interaction effect between grade level and gender. Research in Science Education, 39(1), 75-91.
[2]  Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2011). Research methods in education (7th ed.). USA & Canada: Routledge.
[3]  Martin, M., Mullis, I., & Foy, P. (2008). Timss 2007. International Science Report. TIMSS&PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.
[4] MATSEC Examinations Board. (2014). SEC syllabus (2014): Biology.
[5] MATSEC Support Unit. (January 2010). MATSEC Examinations Board SEC Examinations 2009 statistical report. 
[6] MATSEC Support Unit. (January 2011). MATSEC Examinations Board SEC Examinations 2010 statistical report. 
[7] MATSEC Support Unit. (January 2012). MATSEC Examinations Board SEC Examinations 2011 statistical report.
[8] MATSEC Support Unit. (February 2013). MATSEC Examinations Board SEC Examination 2012 statistical report. 
[9] MATSEC Support Unit. (April 2014). MATSEC Examinations Board SEC Examination 2013 statistical report. 
[10] MATSEC Support Unit. (March 2015). MATSEC Examinations Board SEC Examinations 2014 statistical report. 
[11] MATSEC Support Unit. (December 2015). MATSEC Examinations Board SEC Examinations 2015 statistical report.
[12] Nakhleh, M. (1992). Why some students don't learn chemistry: Chemical misconceptions. Journal of Chemical Education, 69(3), 191-196.
[13] Özmen, H. (2004). Some student misconceptions in chemistry: A literature review of chemical bonding. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 13(2), 147-159.
[14] Scantlebury, K. (2012). Still part of the conversation: Gender issues in science education. Second international handbook.
 

 


Publication date: 2017/03/17
ISBN: 978-88-6292-847-2
Pixel - Via Luigi Lanzi 12 - 50134 Firenze (FI) - VAT IT 05118710481
    Copyright © 2024 - All rights reserved

Privacy Policy

Webmaster: Pinzani.it