In this contribution we will present a project for chemistry students in their freshmen years supporting teaching/learning processes, in which solutions for typical exercises are being presented in the form of complementary video tutorials. The main goal of these so-called sets is the revision of specific subject matter in order to close possible knowledge gaps. Each video contains step-by-step explanations and clarifications, appealing to a broad spectrum of students with varying degrees of prior knowledge [1, 2].The provided explanations are based on distinct learning principles such as the learning from textbook examples, the interlinking of representational levels in terms of Connected Chemistry, as well as learning by means of graduated teaching aids. Depending on the students’ prior knowledge, the sets may have different purposes in the students’ learning processes such as: (a) the revision of fundamental knowledge, (b) the verification of results, (c) the introduction and reflection of alternate approaches, (d) supporting the acquisition and consolidation of self-diagnostic skills, and hence (e) supporting the enhancement of self-regulated learning competencies [3, 4].Additionally, these sets offer various opportunities for the individualization of teaching/learning processes, with the goal of counteracting the students’ heterogeneous prerequisites. We will therefore present several options for the implementation of these sets into educational settings, e.g. using concepts such as the Flipped Classroom method.
[1] He, Y., Swenson, S., Lents, N., Online Video Tutorials Increase Learning of Difficult Concepts in an Undergraduate Analytical Chemistry Course, J. Chem. Edu., 89 (9), 2012, pp. 1128-1132.
[2] Arasasingham R.D., Taagepera, M., Potter, F., Martorell, I., Lonjers, S., Assessing the Effect of Web-Based Learning Tools on Student Understanding of Stoichiometry Using Knowledge Space Theory, J. Chem. Edu., 82 (8), 2005, pp. 1251-1262.
[3] Niegemann, H., Kompendium E-Learning, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2004.
[4] Johnstone, A. H., The development of chemistry teaching, J. Chem. Edu., 70 (9), pp. 701-705.
[5] Russell, J.W., Kozma, R.B., Jones, T., Wykoff, J., Marx, N., Davis, J., Use of Simultaneous-Synchronized Macroscopic, Microscopic and Symbolic Representations to Enhance the Teaching and Learning of Chemical Concepts, J. Chem. Edu., 74 (3), 1997, pp. 330-334.
[6] Pekdag, B., Alternative Methods in Learning Chemistry: Learning with Animation, Simulation, Video and Multimedia, J. Turkish Sci. Edu., 7 (2), 2010, pp. 111-118.
[7] Vélaquez-Marcano, A., Williamson, V.M., Ashkenazi, G., Tasker, R., Williamson, K.C., The Use of Video Demonstrations and Particulate Animation in General Chemistry, J. Sci. Edu. and Tech, 13 (3), 2004, pp. 315-317.
[8] Freiman, T., Kumulatives Lernen im Biologieunterricht, Praxis der Naturwissenschaften - Biologie in der Schule, 50 (7), 2001.
[9] Mayer, R.E., Multimedia learning, Cambridge, New York, 2009, pp. 85-242.
[10] Pfeifer, P., Konkrete Fachdidaktik Chemie, München, 2002.
[11] Stieff, M., Wilensky, U., Connected Chemistry - Incorporating Interactive Simulations into the Chemistry Classroom, J. Sci. Edu. and Tech, 12 (3), 2003, pp. 285-302.
[12] Rourke, A., Sweller, J., The worked-example effect using ill-defined problems: Learning to recognize designers styles, Elsevier - Learning and Instruction, 19 (2), 2009, pp. 185-199.
[13] Lind, G., Friege, G., Kleinschmidt, L., Sandmann, A., Beispiellernen und Problemlösen, Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Naturwissenschaften, 10, 2004, pp. 29-49.
[14] Handke, J., Kiesler, N., Wiemeyer, L., The Inverted Classroom Model, Conference Proceedings ICM convention, Marburg, 2013.
[15] Herold, M., Landherr, B., SOL - Selbstorganisiertes Lernen: Ein systemischer Ansatz für den Unterricht, Baltmannsweiler, 2003.