Pixel International Conferences

Digital Library Directory > New Perspectives in Science Education 6th Edition 2017
New Perspectives in Science Education 6th Edition 2017

Impact and Importance of Teaching Nuclear Processes, History, and Contemporary Issues in the Middle Grades

Peter N. Knutson

Abstract

Out of the scientific discoveries of the 20th Century, the harnessing of the power of the atom stands above all else in its impact on our world.  Despite its global impact, nuclear processes are all but ignored in the middle grades, even though it is well within their cognitive abilities.  The world’s use of this technology provides rife opportunities for students to explore the impact of science on the global stage, politics, energy, environment, and humanity (in both its personal and existential forms).  I have expanded what most teachers utilize 2-3 days for into a month-long unit, that focuses not only on the scientific processes themselves, but also the impact.  We go deeply into all components of the science behind these processes.  Students become extremely confident in their intelligence when they utilize equations to represent nuclear decay and Einstein’s E = mc2. Beyond the science we delve into the impact on ALL realms of nuclear weapons and geopolitics of the 20th Century and the social mindset they caused, nuclear contamination from testing, industry, and nuclear power. This provides ample discussion points for students to explore, with debate frequently utilized in class.  This year my honors class Skyped with a nuclear history expert, where they each developed highly cognitive and thoughtful questions.  The confidence and academic strength gained by these students was large.  Beyond the Cold War we also focus on contemporary nuclear issues including current Trump/Putin nuclear comments and North Korea’s nuclear program and claims.  Regarding North Korea, my students evaluated multiple claims made by Kim Jong Un, and developed and argumentative responses to these claims, which they sent to experts, who returned accolades for their accuracy of work and depth of analysis, including William J. Perry, The Stanford Center, and the National Nuclear Security Agency.  After this unit, students have an expanded mindset to the impact of this science and have gained confidence in their own scientific competencies and analytical abilities.  The presentation will focus on these approaches, outcomes from this unit, and the argument that nuclear issues must play a larger role in middle grade science curricula.  

References:

[1] Miller, M. “Terrible knowledge and tertiary trauma, part I: Japanese nuclear trauma and resistance to the atomic bomb in the classroom”, The Clearing House 86, 2013, 157-163
[2] Sunal, C.S & Sunal, D. “Nuclear reactions: Studying peaceful applications in the middle and secondary school”, The Social Studies (90)4, 1999, 164-170
[3] Duhaylongsod, L., et al. “Toward disciplinary literacy: Dilemmas and challenges in cesigning history curriculum to support middle school students”, Harvard Educational Review 85(4), 2015, 587 - 608
[4] Cole, C., et al. “Seeking information for a middle school history project: The concept of implicit knowledge in the students’ transition from Kuhlthau’s Stage 3 to Stage 4”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 64(3), 558-573, 2013
[5] Lesher, A.I. & Agre, P. “Bridging science and society” Science 327(5968), American Association for the Advancement of Science, 2010, 921
[6] [G] Laughter, J. & Adams, A. “Culturally relevant science teaching in middle school”, Urban Education 47(6), 2012, 1106-1134
[7] Marshall, J.C. & Smart, J.B. “Interactions between classroom discourse, teacher questioning, and student cognitive engagement in middle school science”, Journal of Science Teacher Education 24, 2013, 249-267
[8] Murmann, M. & Avraamidou, L. “Narrative as learning tool in science centers: potentials, possibilities and merits”, Journal of Science Communication 13(2), 2014, 1-16
[9] Kinzel, K. “Narrative and evidence.  How can case studies from the history of science support claims in the philosophy of science?”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 49, 2015, 48-57.
 [10]  Else, M.J. “Using analogies in science teaching and curriculum design: Some guidelines” Models and Modeling in Science Education, Springer Netherlands, 2008, 215 - 231 
 [11] Carrejo, D.J. & Reinhartz, J. “Facilitating conceptual change through modeling in the middle school science classroom: This article examines a professional development program that helped teachers use models as a means to foster conceptual change in eighth grade science students and deepen their understanding about motion”, Middle School Journal 46 (2), 2014, 10-19
 

Publication date: 2017/03/17
ISBN: 978-88-6292-847-2
Pixel - Via Luigi Lanzi 12 - 50134 Firenze (FI) - VAT IT 05118710481
    Copyright © 2024 - All rights reserved

Privacy Policy

Webmaster: Pinzani.it