The concept of a learning environment emerges within the constructivist paradigm as an evolution of the notion of context; the systemic theories and those on group dynamics have provided the theoretical starting point for the construction of reflections on the new learning contexts changed in the age of technology. According to the studies analyzed, the learning environments are described by three fundamental characteristics: the setting, the teaching methodology used and the reference theory that legitimizes and makes the educational process effective. The purpose of this article is to examine some positive and negative effects of technology on teenagers’ learning styles and group dynamics. From a methodological perspective, it will be provided a systematic review of the existing literature on both contemporary teaching experiences, by examining the types of learning contexts experimented, and on educational strategies aimed at promoting positive effects through the analysis of the relationships between technology and learning processes. By comparing empirical studies and international experiences, it can be suggested that technological learning environments play a key role in the revival of the educational function and in the promotion of scholastic success, as the effective use of technology could facilitate and decree the educational success of the students.
Keywords: Didactic methodologies; Media education; Technology; Learning objects;
References
[1] Cucchiara, S., Ligorio, M.B., & Fujita, N. “Understanding Online Discourse Strategies for Knowledge Building Through Social Network Analysis”. In Lim, H.L. (Ed.). Innovative methods and technologies for electronic discourse analysis (pp. 42-62). IGI Global, 2014.
[2] Toto, G.A. “The influences of musical learning on psycho-physical development, intelligence and technology”. The online journal of educational tecnology, 16, 2017, 801-807.
[3] Strazzeri, I. & Toto, G.A. “Globalization: Between Immigration and Discrimination, What Opportunities Emerge in this New Order?”. Proceedings of the 30th International Business Information Management Association Conference (IBIMA) - Education Excellence and Innovation Management through Vision 2020: From Regional Development Sustainability to Global Economic Growth2017, Vienna; Austria; 8 November 2017 through 9 November 2017.
[4] Boyle, T. “Design principles for authoring dynamic, reusable learning objects”. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 19(1), 2003, 46-58.
[5] Bacca, J., Baldiris, S., Fabregat, R., & Graf, S. “Augmented reality trends in education: a systematic review of research and applications”. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 17(4), 2014, 133.
[6] Smiraglia, S., Grimaldi, D., & Conte, M., “La didattica blended tra formale e informale: personalizzazione e socializzazione nei processi di conoscenca”. In Albanese, O., Ligorio, M.B., & Zanetti, M.A. (Eds.). . Identità, apprendimento e comunità virtuali. Strumenti e attività on line: Strumenti e attività on line (pp.35-48). FrancoAngeli: Milano. 2012.
[7] Terrone, G., & Santona, A. “The psychopathological risk in preadolescence”. Giornale italiano di psicologia, 39(3), 2012, 697-706.
[8] Monacis, L., Finamore, R., Sinatra, M., Bitonto, P.D., Roselli, T., & Rossano, V. “Adaptive learning using SCORM compliant resources” Proceedings: DMS 2009 - 15th International Conference on Distributed Multimedia Systems, 2009, 222-227.
[9] Toto, G.A. “The Role of The musical Learning in the Development of the socio and cognitive abilities. A review”, The Online Journal Of Educational Technology, 16, 2017, 604- 610.
[10] Limone, P., & Pace, R. “The Learning by Design Framework in School and Out-of-School Contexts: Research Experiences and Perspectives”. In Cope B., & Kalantzis M. (eds). A Pedagogy of Multiliteracies (pp.157-171). Palgrave Macmillan: Londra. 2015.
[11] Fraticelli, F., Marchetti, D., Polcini, F., Mohn, A. A., Chiarelli, F., Fulcheri, M., & Vitacolonna, E. “Technology-based intervention for healthy lifestyle promotion in Italian adolescence”. Annali dell'Istituto superiore di sanita, 52(1), 2016, 123-127.