Pixel International Conferences

The article summarizes observations and ideas of renovation of the methodic structure of gaining knowledge of the foreign language lexis studied (Bulgarian and English), related to the names of nations, nationalities, ethnic groups and ethnic communities. 
The main thesis is that ethnonyms as a lexical group in both languages contain a great part of the cultural heritage and psychology of a nation.
The presentation of this specific lexical group in the foreign language aims at pointing important characteristics in the difference which is to be found in the thinking and traditions of interethnic relations, as well as their reflection in the two languages. Practical steps and methods, valid in their sequence are given as to the introduction of the subject. The formal and structural characteristics of ethnonyms are analyzed in detail so as to eliminate the problems and mistakes when they are learned. The analysis of the methodic circumstances undoubtedly proves the fact that there is a complex and not very well known  interdependency between ethnonyms and social psychology, between language and national culture, with which the teacher should coordinate the effectiveness of language teaching.

Keywords: Ethnic groups, foreign language teaching.

References:

[1] Gyurova 2009 – Gyurova, V. Pedagogical technologies of game interaction.
[2] Ivanov 2005 – Along the way of Bulgarian ethnonym. Alphamarket publishing house. Stara Zagora town.
[3] Nikonov 1970 – Ethnonymia – In: Ethnonyms, Nauka.
[4] Petkanov 1957 – The words Bulgarian and Slav in Italian language.- In: Linguistic research in honour of academician St. Mladenov, Bulgarian Academy of Science publishing house, Sofia
[5] Rizov 2003 – Languages and ethnoses in Africa. (Book 2) International Sociolinguistic Society, p. 467, Sofia.
[6] Stoyanov 2011- Critical estimate of “different thinking” as a strategy in the good methods of foreign language teaching. – In  a book Education and Technologies. Innovations in Teaching and Cognitive Development, issue 2/2011, pp. 216-219.