Pixel International Conferences

The present paper sets out to determine the relevance of the linguistic choices of the ESP instructors during their teaching sessions and to detect to which extent can language improve students’ engagement in studying. Most of the time, instructors tend to focus on the content of the lesson in terms of information and technology, and little thought, or consideration, is being given to the semantic selection from the point of view of creating the best studying environment through discourse. Since discourses create realities, the present study tries to correlate the results of a survey applied to an ESP group of students with the observations of the linguistic choices used within their ESP classes. The results may be taken as a template for linguistic selection in teaching, and, at the same time they raise awareness of the importance of language in communication.

Keywords: ESP teaching, student engagement, linguistic selection in teaching, communication.

References:

• Belyaeva, Anastasiia (2015) English for Specific Purposes: Characteristic Features and Curriculum Planning Steps, in Sustainable Multilingualism, No.7, ISSN 2335-2027.
• Flowerdew, Lynne (2013) Needs Analysis and Curriculum Development in ESP in Brian Paltridge and Sue Starfield (eds.) The Handbook of English for Specific Purposes, (pp.325-347), London: John Wiley and Sons.
• Anderson, Mike (2019) What We Say and How We Say It Matter, ASCD, ISBN 1416627049
• Zglobiu, Octavia Raluca (2020) Converting classroom to online teaching – some challenges and tips, Presa Universitara Clujeana.
• Rowe, J. (2005). Since feeling is first: Narrative inquiry toward understanding emotion in online teaching and learning. University of WISCONSIN-MADISON Doctoral dissertation.