Pixel International Conferences

This study investigates the nature of science (NOS) views of Maltese, post-secondary lecturers. The research tools were the SUSSI questionnaire coupled with semi-structured interviews based on the VNOS-Form C questionnaire. A total of 252 questionnaires and ten interviews were collected. They had transitional to adequate views on five NOS components: the tentativeness of scientific theories, scientific methodology, the social/cultural aspect of science, the use of imagination and creativity, and the nature of observations and inferences with inadequate views regarding the distinction between laws and theories.

The NOS ideas of various subgroups were highly uniform per age group and lecturing experience. Gender yielded a statistically significant difference on the distinction between laws and theories. Comparing areas of specialisation, applied science lecturers had more naïve views on most NOS components, yielding statistically significant differences on imagination and creativity and changes in theories. Considering closest traditional area, lecturers with Physics as closest area exhibited more naïve views on both change of scientific theories and the social/cultural aspect. For NOS views per highest qualification, PhDs had significantly better views on change of scientific theories.

Keywords:  NOS, post-secondary sector, lecturers

REFERENCES

1.   Creswell, J. W. (2015). A Concise Introduction to Mixed Methods Research. SAGE.

2.   Irez, S. (2006). Are We Prepared? An Assessment of Preservice Science Teacher Educators’ Beliefs About Nature of Science. Science Education, 90, 1113-1143.

3.   Lederman, N. G., Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Schwartz, R. S. (2002). Views of nature of science questionnaire: Toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners’ conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(6), 497-521.

4.   Liang, L. L., Chen, S., Chen, X., Kaya, O. N., Adams, A. D., Macklin, M., & Ebenezer, J. (2009). Preservice teachers' views about the Nature of Scientific Knowledge Development: An international collaborative study. International Journal of Science Education, 7, 987-1012.

5.   Miller, M. C., Montplaisir, M. L., Offerdahl, E. G., Cheng, F., & Ketterling, G. L. (2010). Comparison of views of the nature of science between natural science and nonscience majors. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 9, 45-54.

6.   Schwartz, R.S., & Lederman, N. G. (2008). What Scientists Say: Scientists’ views of nature of science and relation to science context. International Journal of Science Education, 30(6), 727-771.

7.   Shi, W., & Wang, J. (2017). Comparison on views of Nature of Science between Math and Physics students. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 16(1), 77-85.

8.   Vella Bondin, A. (2016). Nested epistemologies: Secondary school science teachers views of nature of science, teaching and learning and implications for practice (Unpublished master's thesis). University of Malta, Msida, Malta.