Pixel International Conferences

Digital Library Directory > Innovation in Language Learning 17th Edition 2024
Innovation in Language Learning 17th Edition 2024

Students’ Perceptions of Generative AI Use in Academic Writing

Andrew S. Nelson; Paola V. Santamaría; Josephine S. Javens

Abstract

ChatGPT and other generative AI models are projected to transform the educational landscape. One common conclusion is that ChatGPT will gain prominence as a powerful educational tool, enabling language learners to study more independently and efficiently than ever before. While many educators have begun to integrate ChatGPT into their teaching practices with these benefits in view, others have expressed concern and rejected its use. This resistance arises largely from teachers’ apprehension that students will use ChatGPT for dishonest purposes, for example submitting AI-generated writing as their own. For these educators, the tool raises critical concerns about academic honesty and integrity. But what do the students themselves think? This study will identify the perspectives of 56 English language learners at a university in Ecuador, using data gathered from a survey on the role of generative AI in academic writing. The results will inform teachers and educational institutions about how students perceive the overall influence of AI on academic integrity within the scope of academic writing, including reasons why students might rely on AI tools for dishonest purposes and how they view the detection of AI-based dishonesty.
 
Keywords: ChatGPT, computer-assisted language learning, student perceptions, academic dishonesty, English as a foreign language.
 
REFERENCES
 
[1] AlAfnan, M. A., Dishari, S., Jovic, M., & Lomidze, K. (2023). ChatGPT as an educational tool: Opportunities, challenges, and recommendations for communication, business writing, and composition courses. Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Technology, 3(2), 60–68.
[2] Alexander, K., Savvidou, C., & Alexander, C. (2023). Who wrote this essay? Detecting AI-generated writing in second language education in higher education. Teaching English with Technology, 23(2), 25–43.
[3] Azoulay, R., Hirst, T., & Reches, S. (2023). Let’s do it ourselves: Ensuring academic integrity in the age of ChatGPT and beyond. TechRxiv. https://doi.org/10.36227/techrxiv.24194874.v1
[4] Bali, M., et al. (2023). Speculative futures on ChatGPT and generative artificial intelligence (AI): A collective reflection from the educational landscape. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 18(1). https://www.asianjde.com/ojs/index.php/AsianJDE/article/view/709
[5] Baidoo-Anu, D., & Owusu Ansah, L. (2023). Education in the era of generative artificial intelligence (AI): Understanding the potential benefits of ChatGPT in promoting teaching and learning. Journal of AI, 7(1), 52–62.
[6] Baskara, R. (2023). Exploring the implications of ChatGPT for language learning in higher education. Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 7(2), 343–358.

Publication date: 2024/11/08
ISBN: 979-12-80225-70-2
Pixel - Via Luigi Lanzi 12 - 50134 Firenze (FI) - VAT IT 05118710481
    Copyright © 2024 - All rights reserved

Privacy Policy

Webmaster: Pinzani.it