The Future of Education
Professional Growth through Collaboration: Unpacking the Dynamics of Teacher Discussions
Duarte Nuno Farbu Pinto, Nord Universitet (Norway)
Inger Lise Valstad, Nord University (Norway)
Abstract
This article aims to explore the factors that promote or hinder professional development in collaborative discussions among teachers, with particular emphasis on how collective processes contribute to the development of professional learning communities. The study is based on a qualitative, exploratory design, involving three focus group interviews with a total of 18 primary and lower secondary school teachers. The data were analyzed using thematic analysis with an abductive approach. The findings indicate that a high degree of relational trust, psychological safety, and an open, exploratory communication style are necessary conditions for collaborative discussions to foster professional reflection and practice-oriented learning. Collegial inspiration, mutual exchange of experiences, and collective teacher efficacy emerge as key driving forces for professional growth. At the same time, barriers such as lack of time, weak organizational structures, and inconsistent participation are identified as factors that can undermine the learning potential of collaborative processes. The article argues that the development of the teaching profession is increasingly dependent on institutionally embedded forms of collaboration that address both relational and organizational dimensions. It highlights the need for continuous evaluation and adaptation of school culture and structure to promote collective learning.
|
Keywords |
Professional development, Collaborative discussions, Professional learning community, Collective teacher efficacy, Instructional leadership, Collegial inspiration, Pedagogical reflection |
|
REFERENCES |
Alvesson, M., & Sköldberg, K. (2017). Reflexive methodology: New vistas for qualitative research. Bandura, A. (1999). Social cognitive theory of personality. Handbook of personality, 2(1), 154-196. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77-101. Donohoo, J. (2017). Collective teacher efficacy research: implications for professional learning. Journal of Professional Capital and Community, 2(2), 101-116. Durksen, T. L., Klassen, R. M., & Daniels, L. M. (2017). Motivation and collaboration: The keys to a developmental framework for teachers’ professional learning. Teaching and teacher education, 67, 53-66. Fairman, J. C., & Mackenzie, S. V. (2015). How teacher leaders influence others and understand their leadership. International journal of leadership in education, 18(1), 61-87. Glickman, C., & Burns, R. W. (2020). Leadership for learning: How to bring out the best in every teacher. ASCD. Goddard, R., Goddard, Y., Sook Kim, E., & Miller, R. (2015). A theoretical and empirical analysis of the roles of instructional leadership, teacher collaboration, and collective efficacy beliefs in support of student learning. American journal of education, 121(4), 501-530. Gray, C., Wilcox, G., & Nordstokke, D. (2017). Teacher mental health, school climate, inclusive education and student learning: A review. Canadian Psychology/psychologie canadienne, 58(3), 203. Horn, I. S., & Little, J. W. (2010). Attending to problems of practice: Routines and resources for professional learning in teachers’ workplace interactions. American educational research journal, 47(1), 181-217. Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2015). Focus group interviewing. Handbook of practical program evaluation, 506-534. Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2015). Interviews. Sage. Morgan, D. L. (1997). Focus groups as qualitative research (Vol. 16). Sage. Nesh, T. (2022). Guidelines for research ethics in the social sciences and the humanities. The Norwegian National Research Ethics Committees. Vangrieken, K., Dochy, F., Raes, E., & Kyndt, E. (2015). Teacher collaboration: A systematic review. Educational research review, 15, 17-40. |
