New Perspectives in Science Education
Effectiveness of Self-Directed Learning in Undergraduate Medical Education: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis
Jasmine Aulakh, St. George’s University School of Medicine, St. George (Grenada)
Hana Wahab, Aureus University School of Medicine, Oranjestad (Aruba)
Christine Richards, St. George’s University School of Medicine, St. George (Grenada)
Prakash V.A.K. Ramdass, St. George’s University School of Medicine, St. George (Grenada)
Abstract
Self-Directed Learning (SDL) is a theory of andragogy in which adult learners take their own initiative to identify and tailor their individual learning process and outcomes. In undergraduate medical education, SDL aims to develop medical students into lifelong learners. This study aims to estimate the overall effectiveness of self-directed learning compared to traditional didactic learning. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis according to the PRISMA statement. A systematic search was used across PubMed, Scopus, Embase and Google Scholar to identify peer-reviewed articles spanning from inception through September 2023. Key words used were “self-directed learning” AND “undergraduate medical education.” Forest plots were generated with the Open Meta-analyst Software, comparing SDL and traditional didactic learning (TDL). A total of 509 articles were screened for eligibility, of which 95 articles met the eligibility criteria for full-text review. Following a more detailed screening, 7 articles met the inclusion criteria for the systematic review and 9 articles for the meta-analysis. The systematic review analyzed 2,772 students while the meta-analysis included 1,317 students. The pooled analysis for all studies demonstrates that SDL had a mean score of 1.91 [95% CI (0.75-3.06)] higher than TDL. Self-directed learning is an effective learning strategy in medical undergraduate education and has the potential to aid in students’ learning and improve their cognitive performance.
|
Keywords |
curriculum; learning strategies; teaching |
|
References |
1. Gillam S, Bagade A. Undergraduate public health education in UK medical schools - struggling to deliver. Med Educ. 2006 May;40(5):430–6.
2. Nathaniel TI, Gainey JC, Williams JA, Stewart BL, Hood MC, Brechtel LE, et al. Impact and educational outcomes of a small group self-directed teaching strategy in a clinical neuroscience curriculum. Anat Sci Educ. 2018;11(5):478–87.
3. Gawad N, Zevin B, Bonrath EM, Dedy NJ, Louridas M, Grantcharov TP. Introduction of a comprehensive training curriculum in laparoscopic surgery for medical students: A randomized trial. Surg U S. 2014;156(3):698–706.
4. Daly C, Vennalaganti P, Soudagar S, Hornung B, Sharma P, Gupta N. Randomized controlled trial of self-directed versus in-classroom teaching of narrow-band imaging for diagnosis of Barrett’s esophagus-associated neoplasia. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 Jan;83(1):101–6.
5. Lian A, Rippey JCR, Carr PJ. Teaching medical students ultrasound-guided vascular access - which learning method is best? J Vasc Access. 2017 May 15;18(3):255–8.
6. CASP. CASP UK. 2020. CASP Systematic Review Checklist. Available from: https://casp-uk.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/CASP-Systematic-Review-Checklist_2018.pdf
7. Mahler SA, Wolcott CJ, Swoboda TK, Wang H, Arnold TC. Techniques for teaching electrocardiogram interpretation: Self-directed learning is less effective than a workshop or lecture. Med Educ. 2011;45(4):347–53.
8. Rong Y, Glozier N, Luscombe GM, Davenport TA, Huang Y, Hickie IB. Improving Knowledge and Attitudes towards Depression: a controlled trial among Chinese medical students. BMC Psychiatry. 2011 Dec;11(1):36.
9. Mahmud W, Haroon M, Munir A, Hyder O. Self-directed Learning and Research Attitudes Among Medical Students. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2013 Sep 25;24(2):173–7.
10. Peine A, Kabino K, Spreckelsen C. Self-directed learning can outperform direct instruction in the course of a modern German medical curriculum - results of a mixed methods trial. BMC Med Educ. 2016 Jun 3;16:158.
|
