Implementing Interdisciplinary Future Skills in Higher Education: Challenges for Science Education
Panagiotis Kitmeridis, Frankfurt University of Applied Sciences (Frankfurt UAS) (Germany)
Abstract
The implementation of interdisciplinary future skills in higher education requires profound curricular, didactic and institutional changes, especially in science education. Interdisciplinary future skills include problem-solving skills in complex systems, interdisciplinary collaboration, digital literacy and reflective judgement, all of which aim to prepare graduates for uncertain, technology-driven societies [e.g. 1; 2]. In science education, these skills must be linked to in-depth subject knowledge so that students can not only apply scientific concepts, but also embed them in social, technological and ethical contexts [3]. This shifts the focus from purely content-oriented curricula to competence- and project-oriented learning arrangements that systematically integrate different disciplines, such as physics, computer science and social sciences [4].
The main challenges relate firstly to institutional and structural conditions. Universities are often divided into strong disciplinary silos, whose study regulations, resource logic and incentive systems make transdisciplinary or interdisciplinary programmes difficult [5]. Teaching loads, examination regulations and accreditation requirements are predominantly subject-centred, so that teachers have little incentive to develop long-term, interdisciplinary future skills formats. Secondly, the professional identity and qualifications of teachers pose a challenge. Many science educators are socialised in a clearly defined subject area and feel uncertain about moderating heterogeneous teams, problem-oriented projects or explicitly promoting collaboration and reflection skills [6].
Thirdly, challenges arise on the learner side. In interdisciplinary settings, students often report cognitive overload, uncertainty about assessment criteria, and difficulties integrating contributions from different disciplines. Fourthly, performance assessment is complex: Traditional, subject-specific examination formats do not adequately reflect cooperative problem-solving processes, transdisciplinary project results and metacognitive learning progress [7].
The article argues that the successful implementation of interdisciplinary future skills in science education requires a multidimensional strategy. These include: curricular design principles that link scientific concepts with societal challenges (e.g. education for sustainable development); systematic programmes for the university-level didactic qualification of teachers in the field of interdisciplinary teaching and future skills; and adapted examination formats that equally assess individual and collective performance, process and product quality.
|
Keywords |
Future Skills, Higher Education, Skills, curricular design |
|
REFERENCES |
[1] OECD: The Future of Education and Skills Education 2030, 2018[online] https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2018/06/the -future-of-education-and-skills_5424dd26/54ac7020-en.pdf [2] Ehlers, Ulf‐Daniel/Sarah Kellermann: Future Skills: The Future of Learning and Higher Education, 30.03.2020, [online] https://www.learntechlib.org/p/208249/report_208249.pdf. [3] The Case for STEM Education: Challenges and Opportunities: in: National Science Teachers Association eBooks, 01.01.2013, [online] doi:10.2505/9781936959259. [4] National Research Council (NRC) (2012). A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas. Washington DC: The National Academies Press. [5] Lyall, C./I. Fletcher: Experiments in interdisciplinary capacity-building: The successes and challenges of large-scale interdisciplinary investments, in: Science And Public Policy, Bd. 40, Nr. 1, 18.01.2013, [online] doi:10.1093/scipol/scs113, S. 1–7. [6] Spelt, E.J.H., Biemans, H.J.A., Tobi, H. et al. Teaching and Learning in Interdisciplinary Higher Education: A Systematic Review. Educ Psychol Rev 21, 365–378 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-009-9113-z [7] Knight, Peter T./Mantz Yorke: Employability and Good Learning in Higher Education, in: Teaching in Higher Education, Bd. 8, Nr. 1, 01.01.2003, [online] doi:10.1080/1356251032000052294, S. 3–16.
|
The Future of Education




























