The Future of Education

Seventy-five percent of homes in the United States have internet access and digital devices highlighting that technology is now accessible to an increasing number of families. The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of mLearning or mobile device practice on the attention and accuracy of student’s use of math concepts, specifically, telling time. Teachers and school districts are struggling to determine the best ways to take advantage of children’s interest in technological devices for enhanced learning. A variety of digital technology (e.g., iPad, iPod touch, computer, smartphone) have been demonstrated to increase engagement and children learning. One such technology is mLearning, which refers to the use of mobile devices to aid in student learning. A single subject, alternating treatment design was used to compare mLearning to paper & pencil practice in four 3rd grade male students. Results indicated higher on-task behavior for students during the mLearning, as compared to the paper & pencil condition. However, students completed more problems during the paper & pencil practice, with mixed results on the number of problems correctly completed across students. Implications for classroom teachers would be that the use of an iPad does have students more engaged with work for practice of skills.

Keywords: iPad app, mLearning, technology, math, elementary.

References:
[1] Alberto, P. A., & Troutman, A. C. (2012). Applied behavior analysis for teachers (9th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
[2] American Academy of Pediatrics (2016). Media and children communication toolkit. Retrieved from
https://www.aap.org/en-us/advocacy-and-policy/aap-health-initiatives/pages/media-and-children.aspx
[3] Bandura, A. (1977). Social Learning Theory. New York, NY: General Learning Press.
[4] Banilower, E. R., Smith, P. S., Weiss, I. R., Malzahn, K. A., Campbell, K. M., & Weis, A. M. (2013). Report of the 2012 national survey of science and mathematics education. Chapel Hill, NC: Horizon Research, Inc.
[5] Barlow, D. H., & Hayes, S. C. (1979). Alternating treatments design: One strategy for comparing the effects of two treatments in a single subject. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 12(2), 199–210. doi:10.1901/jaba.1979.12-199
[6] Burns, M. K., Kanive, R., & DeGrande, M. (2012). Effect of a computer-delivered math fact intervention as a supplemental intervention for math in third and fourth graders. Remedial and Special Education, 33, 184–191.
[7] Cooper, J. O., Heron, T. E., & Heward, W. L. (2007). Applied behavior analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
[8] Ellison, D. (2015). At what point does it become technology for technology’s sake? Retrieved from
https://tech.co/technology-for-technologys-sake-2015-10.
[9] Haydon, T. Hawkins, R., Denune, H., Kimener, L., McCoy, D., & Basham, J. (2012). A comparison of iPads and worksheets on math skills of high school students with emotional disturbance. Behavioral Disorders, 37(4), 232-243.
[10] Kazdin, A. E. (2011). Single-case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
[11] Kratochwill, T. R., Hitchcock, J., Horner, R. H., Levin, J. R., Odom, S. L., Rindskopf, D. M. & Shadish, W. R. (2010). Single-case designs technical documentation. Retrieved from What Works Clearinghouse website:
http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/pdf/wwc_scd.pdf
[12] National Association for the Education of Young Children and the Fred Rogers Center for Early Learning and Children’s Media at Saint Vincent. (2012). Technology and interactive media as tools in early childhood programs serving children birth through age 8. Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children; Latrobe, PA: Fred Rogers Center for Early Learning and Children’s Media at Saint Vincent College.
[13] National Mathematics Advisory Panel. (2008). Foundations for success: The final report of the national mathematics advisory panel. Washington, DC: U. S. Department of Education.
[14] Ulman, J. D., & Sulzer-Azaroff, B. (1975). Multielement baseline design in educational research. In E. Ramp & G. Semb (Eds.), Behavior analysis: Areas of research and application (pp. 377-391). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.