The Future of Education

Edition 14

Accepted Abstracts

Attitudes towards Multiple Choice Questions among Business Students

Leiv Opstad, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (Norway)

Abstract

The choice of assessment design in higher education has been a topic in the literature for decades. This study is from a business school in Norway. In the introductory courses there are more than 600 students with different instructors. The exam form has mostly been four hours of constructed response (CR) questions, but in some courses multiple choice (MC) tests are included as a part of the assessment. There is currently a debate about whether to increase the use of MC. The purpose of this paper is to explore students’ attitudes towards MC by asking 130 undergraduates. Results indicate students prefer a combination of those two test formats. They want MC to be a compliment to CR, but they do not want MC to replace CR completely. MC questions will reflect the students’ knowledge of the subjects to a lesser degree. It will probably change the students’ learning strategy where one emphasises details more than understanding. Furthermore, there is a substantial gender difference. The males have a more positive attitude towards MC tests, and to a greater extent they will than females adjust their behaviour if one decides to change the exam format.

Keywords: multiple choice test, business school, gender, independent-samples T-test.

References:
[1] Becker, W. E., & Johnston, C. (1999). The relationship between multiple choice and essay response questions in assessing economics understanding. Economic Record, 75(4), 348-357
[2] Birenbaum, M., & Feldman, R. A. (1998). Relationships between learning patterns and attitudes towards two assessment formats. Educational Research, 40(1), 90-98.
[3] Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives. Vol. 1: Cognitive domain. New York: McKay, 20-24.
[4] Chan, N., & Kennedy, P. E. (2002). Are multiple-choice exams easier for economics students? A comparison of multiple-choice and" equivalent" constructed-response exam questions. Southern Economic Journal, 957-971.
[5] Livingston, S. A., & Rupp, S. L. (2004). Performance of men and women on multiple‐choice and constructed‐response tests for beginning teachers. ETS Research Report Series, 2004(2), 1-25.
[6] Nield, A. F., & Wintre, M. G. (1986). Multiple-choice questions with an option to comment: Student attitudes and use. Teaching of Psychology, 13(4), 196-199.
[7] Simkin, M. G., & Kuechler, W. L. (2005). Multiple‐choice tests and student understanding: What is the connection?. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 3(1), 73-98.
[8] Van de Watering, G., Gijbels, D., Dochy, F., & Van der Rijt, J. (2008). Students’ assessment preferences, perceptions of assessment and their relationships to study results. Higher Education, 56(6), 645-658
[9] Zeidner, M. (1987). Essay versus multiple-choice type classroom exams: the student’s perspective. The Journal of Educational Research, 80(6), 352-358

Back to the list

REGISTER NOW

Reserved area


Media Partners:

Click BrownWalker Press logo for the International Academic and Industry Conference Event Calendar announcing scientific, academic and industry gatherings, online events, call for papers and journal articles
Pixel - Via Luigi Lanzi 12 - 50134 Firenze (FI) - VAT IT 05118710481
    Copyright © 2024 - All rights reserved

Privacy Policy

Webmaster: Pinzani.it