Resisting Automation: Inclusivity, Empathy, and Culturally Sensitive Pedagogies in the Future of Education
Anna Apostolidou, Ionian Unviersity (Greece)
Alexandra Androusou, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (Greece)
Abstract
The rapid proliferation of automation and artificial intelligence necessitates a critical reimagining of education, calling for pedagogical frameworks rooted in inclusivity, empathy, and cultural sensitivity. This paper critically examines these imperatives through the “Teach.in.G.” teacher training program, implemented by the National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (NKUA) with UNICEF’s support. Designed to prepare educators to engage with refugee and migrant students, the 400-hour program utilized synchronous and asynchronous digital tools, carefully curated online platforms, and an interdisciplinary framework drawing on anthropology, sociology, psychology, linguistics, and pedagogy. While acknowledging the utility of AI and digital technologies in expanding access and efficiency, the program’s epistemological foundation resisted the seductive ease of algorithmic standardization and dehumanization [1]. Instead, through the use of mentors and targeted exercises, it prioritized pedagogies of care, creative engagement, and context-sensitive adaptation to diverse learning needs [2]. The instructional design of Teach.in.G. exemplified a human-centered approach, embedding principles of multilingualism, multimodality, and differentiated instruction into the very architecture of the online platform [3]. This integration highlights how digital environments can foster communities of practice and support equitable, learner-focused teaching without capitulating to mechanistic efficiencies [4]. By situating AI as a tool rather than an arbiter of pedagogy, the program demonstrated the necessity of interdisciplinary collaboration to safeguard education as a space of cultural exchange, relationality, and transformative potential in the face of increasing automation [5].
Keywords |
Digital Tools, Empathy-Based Pedagogy, Culturally Responsive Teaching, Pedagogies of Care, Resistance to AI automation. |
REFERENCES |
[1] Forsythe, D. (2001). Studying those who study us: An anthropologist in the world of artificial intelligence. Stanford University Press. [2] Lave, Jean, and Etienne Wenger. 1991. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [3] Androusou, Alexandra and Maria Iakovou. 2020. “Refugee Children’s Integration in Greece: Training Future Teachers to Face New Educational Challenges.” International Journal of Early Years Education 28 (2): 162–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669760.2020.1765090 [4] Apostolidou, A. (2023). Anthropological approaches to digital education. Kallipos, Open Academic Editions. https://dx.doi.org/10.57713/kallipos-188\ [5] Vincent-Lancrin, S., & Van der Vlies, R. (2020). Trustworthy artificial intelligence (AI) in education: Promises and challenges. https://doi.org/10.1787/19939019 |