Mapping Assessment in Italian Schools: Are Innovations in Practices Taking Place?
Giorgia Slaviero, University of Padua (Italy)
Beatrice Doria, University of Padua (Italy)
Valentina Grion, Online University Pegaso (Italy)
Abstract
Assessment is a key factor in learning and personal growth [1]. In addition to traditional approaches such as summative and formative assessment [2] [1], recent research highlights the benefits of New Assessment Practices (NAP) [3]; [4]. However, the Italian context seems largely anchored to traditional models, particularly the dominance of summative assessment, but there are no studies investigating assessment practices in schools on a national level. Overcoming these models is crucial for building a more equitable, inclusive, and motivating educational system [5] [6].
This study aims to explore the assessment approaches and practices outlined in the Three-Year Educational Offer Plan (PTOF) and Self-Evaluation Report (RAV) of Italian schools. The research questions are: What conceptualizations, tools, and assessment practices emerge from schools' statements? How do these relate to the current theoretical models proposed in educational research?
A total of 726 documents from a representative sample of schools were analyzed using Atlas.ti 24 software [7]. Initial analysis shows that schools view assessment as a continuous and integrated process of learning, but NAP practices, and in particular student involvement in the assessment process, are limited. In reference to this results, pedagogical considerations are proposed in conclusion.
Keywords |
Student Assessment, School, PTOF, RAV |
REFERENCES |
[1] Grion, V, Restiglian, E. & Slaviero, G. (2025). La valutazione tra pari nella scuola primaria. Teorie e pratiche per sviluppare apprendimenti. Carocci [2] Grion, V., & Serbati, A. (2019). Valutazione sostenibile e feedback nei contesti universitari. Prospettive emergenti, ricerche e pratiche. Pensa MultiMedia. [3] Dochy, F. J. R. C., Segers, M., & Sluijsmans, D. (1999). The use of self-, peer and co-assessment in higher education: A review. Studies in Higher education, 24(3), 331-350. [4] Varisco, B. M. (2004). Portfolio : valutare gli apprendimenti e le competenze. Carocci. [5] Piricò, M., Stevanovic, T., Salvisberg, M., & Giovannini, V. (2024). Per lo sviluppo di una cultura valutativa: strategie divulgative ed esperienze formative nell’ambito della valutazione per competenze nel Canton Ticino. IUL Research, 5(9), 331–347. https://doi.org/10.57568/iulresearch.v5i9.572 [6] Brown, S. (2005). Assessment for Learning. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education (1), 81-89. [7] Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2012). Thematic analysis. American Psychological Association. |