A Comparative Study of the Effects of Interactive Versus Individual Performance Tasks on EFL Learners’ Speaking Skill
Ehsan Zolfaghari Younesi, Islamic Azad University - North Tehran Branch (Iran, Islamic Republic of)
Roya Khoii, Islamic Azad University - North Tehran Branch (Iran, Islamic Republic of)
Abstract
Interaction has always been viewed as a key element in developing the knowledge of an L2 and establishing dynamic communicative episodes. However, it is not always materialized in foreign language learning contexts where access to English speakers is limited. Hence, this study investigated the effects of employing interactive and individual performance tasks on Iranian male EFL learners’ speaking ability. The participants were 32 homogeneous upper-intermediate EFL learners in two intact classes randomly assigned to two experimental groups. The first experimental group performed problem-solving, reasoning-gap, and opinion-gap tasks individually, and the second employed problem-solving, reasoning-gap, and information-gap tasks through team-work for 16 sessions. Two speaking pre- and post-tests were administered to evaluate the participants’ oral performance before and after the treatment. The statistical analysis of the data showed no statistically significant difference between the mean scores of the two groups on the speaking post-test, indicating that neither form of performance was superior to the other in the process of developing L2 oral proficiency. However, the results of two paired samples t-tests demonstrated that the learners’ speaking skill had significantly improved in both groups at the end of the experiment. Therefore, the researchers concluded that a careful execution of individual performance tasks in the absence of interaction could also contribute to developing speaking an L2.
Keywords |
Communicative tasks, interactive tasks, individual tasks, speaking, TBLT |
References |
Aubrey, S., King, J., & Almukhaild, H. (2020). Language learner engagement during speaking tasks: A longitudinal study. RELC Journal, 53(3), 519-533. doi:10.1177/0033688220945418 Bygate, M. (2020). Some directions for the possible survival of TBLT as a real-world project. Language Teaching, 53(3), 275-288. doi:10.1017/s0261444820000014 Chen, W. (2019). Patterns of pair interaction in communicative tasks: The transition process and effect on L2 teaching and learning. ELT Journal, 76(2), e6-e6. doi:10.1093/elt/ccz013 Ellis, R. (2017). Position paper: Moving task-based language teaching forward. Language Teaching, 50(4), 507-526. doi:10.1017/s0261444817000179 Illés, É., & Akcan, S. (2016). Bringing real-life language use into EFL classrooms. ELT Journal, 71(1), 3-12. doi:10.1093/elt/ccw049 Rieker, J. (2021). Alison Mackey: Interaction, feedback and task research in second language learning: Methods and design. Applied Linguistics, 1-4. doi:10.1093/applin/amu069 Saito, K., & Akiyama, Y. (2016). Video-based interaction, negotiation for comprehensibility, and second language speech learning: A longitudinal study. Language Learning, 67(1), 43-74. doi:10.1111/lang.12184 Yeh, H. C., Chang, W. Y., Chen, H. Y., & Heng, L. (2021). Effects of podcast-making on college students’ English-speaking skills in higher education. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(5), 2845-2867. doi:10.1007/s11423-021-10026-3
|