Innovation in Language Learning

Edition 17

Accepted Abstracts

Beyond the Red Pen: How AI is Changing the Game in Writing Assessment

Reza Farzi, University of Ottawa (Canada)

Abstract

Automated Writing Evaluation (AWE) has emerged as a valuable tool in language instruction, offering immediate feedback and streamlining the assessment process. This paper provides an overview of AWE and examines its research-supported benefits. It further introduces a comparative study between assessments conducted by a veteran English for academic purposes (EAP) instructor and those by generative AI, aiming to investigate the efficacy and advantages of AWE in language learning contexts.

The study investigates the correlation and consistency between assessments performed by an experienced human rater and generative AI in evaluating writing proficiency. Through a quantitative analysis of student writing samples, the study examines the alignment of feedback provided by human instructors and AI evaluators, as well as student perceptions of the feedback received.

Preliminary findings suggest a high degree of agreement between assessments conducted by human and AI raters, indicating the potential for generative AI to replicate the evaluation process performed by human instructors. Moreover, students express satisfaction with the feedback provided by both human and AI evaluators, highlighting the effectiveness of AWE in enhancing the writing learning experience.

 

Keywords

Generative AI, Automated Writing Evaluation (AWE), English for academic purposes (EAP), writing proficiency, formative assessment, summative assessment, student perceptions

 

REFERENCES

  1. Dai, W., Lin, J., Jin, F., Li, T., Tsai, Y.-S., Gašević, D. & Chen, G. (2023). Can large language models provide feedback to student? A case study on ChatGPT. https://doi.org/10.35542/osf.io/hcgzj
  2. Escalante, J., Pack, A., & Barrett, A. (2023). AI-generated feedback on writing: insights into efficacy and ENL student preference. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 57.
  3. Fitria, T. N. (2021). Grammarly as AI-powered English writing asssistant: Students’ alternative for writing English. Metathesis, 5(1), 65–78. https://doi.org/10.31002/metathesis.v5i1.3519
  4. Fütterer, T., Fischer, C., Alekseeva, A., Chen, X., Tate, T., Warschauer, M., & Gerjets, P. (2023). ChatGPT in education: Global reactions to AI innovations. Research Square. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2840105/v1
  5. Weigle, S. C. (2013). English as a second language writing and automated essay evaluation. In M. D. Shermis & J. Burstein (Eds.), The handbook of automated essay evaluation: Current applications and new directions. Routledge.
  6. Zhu, C., Sun, M., Luo, J., Li, T. & Wang, M. (2023). How to harness the potential of ChatGPT in education? Knowledge Management & E-Learning, 15(2), 133–152. https://doi.org/10.34105/j.kmel.2023.15.008

 

 

 

Back to the list

REGISTER NOW

Reserved area


Media Partners:

Click BrownWalker Press logo for the International Academic and Industry Conference Event Calendar announcing scientific, academic and industry gatherings, online events, call for papers and journal articles
Pixel - Via Luigi Lanzi 12 - 50134 Firenze (FI) - VAT IT 05118710481
    Copyright © 2024 - All rights reserved

Privacy Policy

Webmaster: Pinzani.it