Virtual Field Trip To A Geopark: Insights From An Evaluation Study in Geoscience Education
Francisca Melo, Unit of Science Teaching, Faculty of Sciences of Porto University; Secondary School of Aguas Santas (Portugal)
Leonor Cardoso, Unit of Science Teaching, Faculty of Sciences of Porto University; Secondary School of Aguas Santas (Portugal)
Pedro Pimenta, Secondary School of Aguas Santas (Portugal)
Clara Vasconcelos, Interdisciplinary Centre of Marine and Environmental Research (CIIMAR); Unit of Science Teaching & Geosciences, Environmental and Land Planning, Faculty of Sciences of Porto University (Portugal)
Abstract
The teaching of geology in secondary schools has evolved over time, prompting researchers to explore novel approaches and revamp existing ones to enhance teaching methodologies. Fieldwork has become a progressively employed strategy for integrated learning in Geosciences [1] and is called promoting learning and collaborative work [2]. This strategy is traditionally seen as an outdoor activity [3,4,5], a valuable enhancement to traditional indoor teaching and learning methods. This strategy instils a passion for continuous learning by immersing individuals in natural environments, cultural experiences, and societal interactions [6]. Currently, greatly influenced by the COVID-19 pandemic, virtual field trips have begun to occupy a prominent place in education [7,8]. In geological education,
some studies have underscored the contribution of virtual field trips as an alternative to outdoor teaching [9]. Virtual field trips offer a means to surmount travel limitations, enabling the exploration of distant locations, foreign subjects, and learning opportunities [10]. While they may not provide direct contact with nature and the geological study object in a real-world environment, they facilitate the development of digital skills and constructing knowledge. In this study, a teacher-in-training developed a field trip to the UNESCO Geopark Arouca intending to nurture active, critical, and digital
competencies essential for 21st-century employment. The study followed an evaluation research methodology using mixed methods and was applied to 11th-grade students. The convenience sample was two classes, one with the experimental group (n=12 – 4 boys and 8 girls with an average age of
16) and the other with the control group (n=17– 7 boys and 10 girls with an average age of 15.7). The research involved a quasi-experimental study with test-retest in the experimental and control groups and a snapshot application in the experimental group. The teacher in training developed a virtual field trip with Google Earth and applied it during her training. Results were analysed resorting to IBM® SPSS® Statistics version 28, and qualitative data content analysis was done with the snapshot reports. The research findings led the team to conclude that, while both groups exhibited
improvements in knowledge development, only the experimental class demonstrated the acquisition of digital skills. In contrast to traditional outdoor activities, virtual field trips failed to foster collaborative competencies or facilitate contact with nature and its associated benefits. However, they did enable students to virtually "travel" to distant places they couldn't physically visit.
Although additional studies are required to further explore the advantages of virtual field trips, the current research has already highlighted some benefits. In this regard, this virtual strategy could complement other strategies, integrating active methodologies to enhance student engagement in
learning geoscience.
Keywords: Outdoor learning, digital competencies, learning with nature, geoheritage
References
[1] Almeida, P. A. (2012). Fieldwork in Geology: Teachers’ Conceptions and
Practices. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 47, 829 – 834.
[2] Samuel Cornelius Nyarko & Heather L. Petcovic (2023). Do students develop teamwork skills during geoscience fieldwork? A case study of a hydrogeology field course, Journal of Geoscience Education, 71:2, 145-157, DOI: 10.1080/10899995.2022.2107368
[3] Esteves, H.; Fernandes, I.; Vasconcelos, C. (2016). A Field-based Approach to Teach Geoscience: A Study with Secondary Students. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci., 191, 63–67.
[4] Lima, A.; Vasconcelos, C.; Félix, N.; Barros, J.; Mendonça, A. (2009). Field trip activity in an ancient gold mine: Scientific literacy in informal education. Public Underst. Sci., 19, 322–334.
[5] Orion, N. (1993). A model for developing and implementing field trips as an integral part of the science curriculum. School Science and Mathematics, 93(6), 325-31.
[6] O’Brien, L., Burls, A., Bentsen, P., Hilmo, I., Holter, K., Haberling, D., ... &
McLoughlin, J. (2011). Outdoor education, life long learning and skills development in woodlands and green spaces: The potential links to health and wellbeing. Forests, trees and human health, 343-372.
[7] Tuthill, G., & Klemm, E. B. (2002). Virtual field trips: Alternatives to actual field trips. International journal of instructional media, 29(4), 453.
[8] Wen, J., & Gheisari, M. (2020, March). A review of virtual field trip applications in construction education. In Construction Research Congress 2020 (pp. 782-790). Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers.
[9] Çaliskan, O. (2011). Virtual field trips in education of earth and environmental sciences. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 3239-3243.
[10] Leininger-Frézal, C.; Sprenger, S. (2022). Virtual Field Trips in Binational Collaborative Teacher Training: Opportunities and Challenges in the Context of Education for Sustainable Development. Sustainability,14, 12933.