Embedding Authenticity in Assessments for Engineering Education
Parakram Pyakurel, New Model Institute for Technology & Engineering (United Kingdom)
Jean-Baptiste R. G. Souppez, Aston University (United Kingdom)
Abstract
Efforts have been made to adopt authentic assessments [2, 5, 6] in engineering education to boost student engagement and enhance employability skills [3]. However, comprehensive frameworks defining authentic assessment within the context of engineering – along with its objectives and implementation strategies – remain scarce. The lack of robust conceptual frameworks significantly hinders its widespread adoption by higher education institutions. Consequently, this paper identifies the key characteristics of authentic assessments in engineering education, with objectives to train learners to become reflective and globally conscious graduates who are better prepared for the ever changing modern workplaces. Additionally, it seeks to enhance student engagement and widen access to engineering education by capitalising on authentic assessments. An overarching conceptual framework for authentic assessment is proposed for engineering education by extending the notion of authenticity in assessments [1]. Moreover, the opportutinites provided by such an approach in mitigating the potential misuse of Artificial Intelligence [4] in assessment submissions are explored. The framework proposed here allows higher education institutions to effectively adopt authentic assessments in order to train graduates with higher employability skills and address the existing gaps between graduate skills and workplace requirements. Furthermore, the proposed framework helps instill reflective behaviours in students to create a fair and equitable society.
Keywords |
Authentic assessment; Engineering education; Student engagement; Employability skills; Globally conscious |
REFERENCES |
[1] Ajjawi, R., Tai, J., Dollinger, M., Dawson, P., Boud, D., & Bearman, M. (2023). From authentic assessment to authenticity in assessment: broadening perspectives. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 49(4), 499–510. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2023.2271193 [2] BILT. (2024). Authentic assessment. Bristol Institute for Teaching and Learning, University of Bristol. Available at: https://www.bristol.ac.uk/bilt/sharing-practice/guides/authentic-assessment-/ (Accessed 26 Nov. 2024) [3] IET. (2021). Half of new engineering recruits lack the right skills. The Institution of Engineering and Technology. Available at: https://www.theiet.org/media/press-releases/press-releases-2021/press-releases-2021-october-december/16-december-2021-half-of-new-engineering-recruits-lack-the-right-skills (Accessed 26 Nov. 2024) [4] Salinas-Navarro, D. E., Vilalta-Perdomo, E., Michel-Villarreal, R., & Montesinos, L. (2024). Using Generative Artificial Intelligence Tools to Explain and Enhance Experiential Learning for Authentic Assessment. Education Sciences, 14(1), 83. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14010083 [5] Ullah, S. N. (2020). Examples of Authentic Assessments in Engineering Education. 2020 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), Porto, Portugal, pp. 894-897. https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON45650.2020.9125271 [6] Vargas-Mendoza, L., Gallardo-Córdova, K. E., & Castillo-Díaz, S. (2018). Performance and authentic assessment in a mechanical engineering course. Global Journal of Engineering Education, 20(1). Available at: http://wiete.com.au/journals/GJEE/Publish/vol20no1/04-Gallardo-K.pdf (Accessed 26 Nov. 2024) |