New Perspectives in Science Education

Edition 15

Accepted Abstracts

Future-Orientation in Chemistry Education? Curriculum Analysis and Qualitative Insights into Teacher Students’ Attitudes

Edwin Bogdan, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen (Germany)

Luca Sophie Meyer, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen (Germany)

Thomas Waitz, Georg-August-University Göttingen (Germany)

Abstract

Schools today face the challenge of preparing learners for a future shaped by rapid changes. [1] Learners must therefore be equipped not only to follow emerging technological advancements, but also to understand, critically evaluate, and actively shape them. [2] To ensure this, references to future are crucial in science education. While Education for Sustainable Development offers large potential for future-oriented approaches, research indicates that its curricular implementation is still insufficient. [3]

To identify references to future-related contents in chemistry class, this study applies a two-step methodological approach: First, all German chemistry curricula were systemically analyzed using Python-based text screening aligned with predefined clusters of terms associated with future and future technologies. Second, given that the implementation of future references in chemistry class is heavily dependent on teachers' attitudes and competencies, a sample of teacher students was interviewed using a semi-structured interview guide. To find linkages to familiar teaching concepts related to temporal perspectives, participants were explicitly asked to reflect on references to past, present, and future in chemistry teaching. All interviews were subsequently transcribed and evaluated using qualitative content analysis. [4] Our results indicate that participants possess substantially more prior knowledge regarding references to past and present than regarding future-related ones. However, participants assign considerable importance to them underscoring their relevance for chemistry education research.

 

 

Keywords

future technologies, curriculum analysis, interview study

 

REFERENCES

  1. OECD (Ed.). (2019). OECD Future of Education and Skills 2030: OECD Learning Compass 2030.
  2. Haan, G. de (2008). Gestaltungskompetenz als Kompetenzkonzept der Bildung für nachhaltige Entwicklung. In I. Bormann & G. de Haan (Eds.), Kompetenzen der Bildung für nachhaltige Entwicklung (pp. 23‑43). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-90832-8_4
  3. Holst, J., Singer‐Brodowski, M., Brock, A., & Haan, G. de (2024). Monitoring SDG 4.7: Assessing Education for Sustainable Development in Policies, Curricula, Training of Educators and Student Assessment (input‐indicator). Sustainable Development, 32(4), 3908–3923.https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2865
  4. Mayring, P. (2015). Qualitative Content Analysis: Theoretical Background and Procedures. In A. Bikner-Ahsbahs, C. Knipping, & N. Presmeg (Eds.), Approaches to Qualitative Research in Mathematics Education: Examples of Methodology and Methods (pp. 365–380). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9181-6_13

 

Back to the list

REGISTER NOW

Reserved area


Indexed in


Media Partners:

Click BrownWalker Press logo for the International Academic and Industry Conference Event Calendar announcing scientific, academic and industry gatherings, online events, call for papers and journal articles
Pixel - Via Luigi Lanzi 12 - 50134 Firenze (FI) - VAT IT 05118710481
    Copyright © 2025 - All rights reserved

Privacy Policy

Webmaster: Pinzani.it