New Perspectives in Science Education

Edition 14

Accepted Abstracts

Development of Visual Representation Competence Taxonomy (Vrc-T) for Science Teaching and Learning

Hye-Gyoung Yoon, Chnucheon National University of Education (Korea, Republic of)

Abstract

Scientific reading and writing typically includes various forms of visual representations. The use of visual representations makes it possible for scientists to develop models and ideas to explain complex phenomena. Visual representation also plays an important role in communicating, learning, and teaching science concept. So visual representation competence need to be fostered in science education. It is the set of skills and practices associated with the use of a variety of visual representations that includes making decisions about appropriate types and uses of representations as well as the ability to interpret, transform, and produce visual representations to conceptualize scientific ideas. To provide framework conducive to assess visual representation competence and to devise appropriate educational activities for it, a visual representation competence taxonomy (VRC-T) was developed in this study. VRC-T includes two dimensions: the type of visual representation, and the cognitive process of visual representation. The initial categories for each dimension were developed based on literature review. Then validation and revision was made by conducting teachers’ workshop and survey to experts. The types of visual representations were grouped into 3 categories (descriptive, procedural, and explanative representations) and the cognitive processes were grouped into 3 categories (interpretation, integration/organization, and construction). The whole picture of the VRC-T and the sub categories of each dimension would be explained with examples.

Keywords: Visual representation, Taxonomy, Type of visual representation, Cognitive process of visual representation;

References

[1] Evagorou, M., Erduran, S., & Mäntylä, T. "The role of visual representations in scientific practices: from conceptual understanding and knowledge generation to ‘seeing’how science works." International Journal of STEM Education 2.1 (2015): 11.
[2] Lynch, M. "The production of scientific images. Vision and re-vision in the history, philosophy, and sociology of science." Visual cultures of science: rethinking representational practices in knowledge building and science communication (2006): 26-40. 
[3] Tippett, C. D. "What recent research on diagrams suggests about learning with rather than learning from visual representations in science." International Journal of Science Education 38.5 (2016): 725-746. 
[4] Ainsworth, Shaaron, Vaughan Prain, and Russell Tytler. "Drawing to learn in science." Science 333.6046 (2011): 1096-1097.
[5] Kozma, R., & Russell, J. "Students becoming chemists: Developing representational competence." Visualization in science education 1 (2005): 121-146.
[6] Bloom, B. S. "Taxonomy of educational objectives. Vol. 1: Cognitive domain." New York: McKay (1956): 20-24.
[7] Anderson, L. W., et al. "A taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy." New York. Longman Publishing. Artz, AF, & Armour-Thomas, E.(1992). Development of a cognitive-metacognitive framework for protocol analysis of mathematical problem solving in small groups. Cognition and Instruction 9.2 (2001): 137-175.
[8] Churches, A. "Bloom's Digital Taxonomy Retrieved April 9, 2012." (2009).
[9] Moline, S. I see what you mean: Children at work with visual information. Teachers Pub Group Inc, 1995.
[10] Bucat, B., & Mocerino, M. "Learning at the sub-micro level: Structural representations." Multiple representations in chemical education (2009): 11-29.
[11] Gilbert, J. K., & Treagust, D. "Towards a coherent model for macro, submicro and symbolic representations in chemical education." Multiple representations in chemical education (2009): 333-350.
[12] Johnstone, A. H. "The development of chemistry teaching: A changing response to changing demand." J. Chem. Educ 70.9 (1993): 701.
[13] Talanquer, V. (2011). Talanquer, Vicente. "Macro, submicro, and symbolic: the many faces of the chemistry “triplet”." International Journal of Science Education 33.2 (2011): 179-195. 
[14] Jo, K., Jho, H., & Yoon, H.-G. “Analysis of visual representations related to electromagnetism in primary and secondary science textbooks.” New Physics: Sae Mulli, 65(4), (2015): 343-357.
[15] Burton, L. "Helping students become media literate." Workshop’s paper. Australian School Library Association (NSW) Inc. 5th State Conference. 2004.
[16] Mnguni, L. E. (2014). "The theoretical cognitive process of visualization for science education." SpringerPlus 3.1 (2014): 184.
 

Back to the list

REGISTER NOW

Reserved area


Media Partners:

Click BrownWalker Press logo for the International Academic and Industry Conference Event Calendar announcing scientific, academic and industry gatherings, online events, call for papers and journal articles
Pixel - Via Luigi Lanzi 12 - 50134 Firenze (FI) - VAT IT 05118710481
    Copyright © 2024 - All rights reserved

Privacy Policy

Webmaster: Pinzani.it