New Perspectives in Science Education

Edition 14

Accepted Abstracts

CoRubric as a Tool to Improve Argumentation Through Peer-Assessment in Pedagogy Students.

Daniel Cebrián-Robles, University of Malaga (Spain)

Antonio-Joaquín Franco-Mariscal, University of Malaga (Spain)


Argumentation is considered to be one of the fundamental pillars of science. As such, numerous efforts have been made to evaluate the quality of arguments by way of European programs such as PISA or to analyse argumentation in primary or secondary school preservice teachers. Many of these studies have used rubrics to evaluate arguments.
In light of this, herein we present CoRubric as a tool to help in this evaluation process. This research is based on a study with 38 students taking the "Educational evaluation of learning" module in the 3rd year of the Pedagogy Degree at the University of Malaga (Spain). An argumentative task based on the problem of the appearance of tooth decay was proposed as a pilot experience in a socio-scientific framework. The activity required students to argue whether there is a relationship between bacteria and the appearance of caries. Students were told to create arguments and evaluate their partners' contributions in a peer-assessment manner. As a result of this work, an argument evaluation methodology is presented using the free online tool CoRubric.
Furthermore, the initial conceptions as to what students understand by arguing in science were analysed and categorized on the basis of what pedagogy students think about how they should assess a scientific argument made by their peers.

KeywordsArgumentation, assessment, pedagogy, rubric, corubric;


[1] Duschl, R.A., Osborne, J. "Supporting and Promoting Argumentation Discourse in Science   Education", Studies in Science Education, 2002, 38, 39–72.
[2] Taylor, C.A. "Defining Science: A Rhetoric of Demarcation", Wisconsin, The University of Wisconsin Press, 1996.
[3] Toulmin, SE. "The uses of argument", 2003, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1958.
[4] Jiménez-Aleixandre, M.P. "10 Ideas Clave. Competencias en argumentación y uso de pruebas", Barcelona, Graó, 2010.
[5] McNeil, K.L., Knight, A.M. "Teachers’ Pedagogical Content Knowledge of Scientific Argumentation: The Impact of Professional Development on K–12 Teachers", Science Education, 2013, 97, 936–72.
[6] OECD. "The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development", 2016.
[7] Aydeniz, M., Ozdilek, Z. "Assessing and enhancing pre-service science teachers’ self-efficacy to teach science through argumentation: Challenges and possible solutions", International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2015, 1–19.
[8] Larson, A.A., Britt, M.A., Kurby, C.A. "Improving Students’ Evaluation of Informal Arguments", Journal of Experimental Education, 2009, 77, 339–65.
[9] Deng, Y, Wang, H. "Research on evaluation of Chinese students’ competence in written scientific argumentation in the context of chemistry", Chemical Education Research and Practice, 2017, 18, 127–150.
[10] Bulgren, J, Ellis, J, Marquis, J. "The Use and Effectiveness of an Argumentation and Evaluation Intervention in Science Classes", Journal of Science Education and Technology, 2014, 23, 82-97.
[11] Folkes, C., Carmichael, P. "“Learning to assess” and “assessing to learn”: the construction of knowledge about Assistive Technology", Educational Action Research, 2006, 14, 535-45.
[12] Lu, J., Zhang, Z. "Assessing and Supporting Argumentation with Online Rubrics", International Education Studies, Toronto, 2013, 6, 66.
[13] Knight-Bardsley, A., McNeill, K.L. "Teachers’ Pedagogical Design Capacity for Scientific Argumentation", Science Education, 2016, 100, 645–72.
[14] Jonsson, A., Svingby, G. "The use of scoring rubrics: Reliability, validity and educational consequences", Educational Research Review, 2007, 2, 130-44.
[15] OECD. "Assessing scientific, reading and mathematical literacy: A framework for PISA 2006", Brussels, OECD, 2006.
[16] Boud, D., Cohen, R., Sampson, J. "Peer Learning and Assessment", Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 1999, 24, 413–26.
[17] Clark, D.B., Sampson, V. "Assessing dialogic argumentation in online environments to relate structure, grounds, and conceptual quality", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2008, 45, 293-321.
[18] Cebrián-Robles, D. "CoRubric", 2016.
[19] Osborne, J.F., Henderson, J.B., MacPherson, A., Szu, E., Wild, A., Yao, S. "The development and validation of a learning progression for argumentation in science", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2016, 53, 821–46.

Back to the list


Reserved area

Media Partners:

Click BrownWalker Press logo for the International Academic and Industry Conference Event Calendar announcing scientific, academic and industry gatherings, online events, call for papers and journal articles
Pixel - Via Luigi Lanzi 12 - 50134 Firenze (FI) - VAT IT 05118710481
    Copyright © 2024 - All rights reserved

Privacy Policy